Ranking Bob Dylan Songs, #54: Masters Of War

They don’t come much more finger-pointing-y than “Masters of War.” Just a little over a year after The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan was released, Bob Dylan would tell The New Yorker’s Nat Hentoff that his next album (Another Side of Bob Dylan) wouldn’t have any “finger-pointing songs”:

“Those records I’ve already made, I’ll stand behind them, but some of that was jumping into the scene to be heard and a lot of it was because I didn’t see that anybody else was doing that kind of thing. Now a lot of people are doing finger-pointing songs. You know—pointing to all the things that are wrong. Me, I don’t want to write for people anymore. You know, be a spokesman…. From now on, I want to write from inside me.”

And yet what makes “Masters of War” so effective as a protest song is that it is so intensely personal. If you look at protest songs of the last few years (and George W. Bush spawned practically a whole genre of them), they are full of vitriolic plays on words (“Texas führer,” “this Weapon of Mass Destruction that we call our President,” “you and Saddam should kick it like back in the day,” etc.) and clichés (“Fuck Bush,” “No blood for oil,” “Does he ever smell his own bullshit?”). Basically, they pick an easy target and toss schoolyard insults at it. In other words, they suck.

“Masters of War” isn’t about clever wordplay, and it’s certainly not aimed at convincing those on the fence. Unlike most standard protest songs, there is no sense that Dylan is speaking on behalf of anyone else. In fact, there are only two people mentioned in the song: the “I” voice of the song itself, and an unspecific “you” against whom Dylan has a litany of complaints. This is a personal fight, and Dylan is not shying away from it.

He starts by identifying his target: “Come you masters of war, you that build all the guns / You that build the death planes, you that build the big bombs.” Although “Masters of War” would come to be associated with the Vietnam War thanks to Dylan’s (unintentional) affiliation with the counterculture of the 1960s, it’s important to realize that the target of the song is not any particular war (the release of the song predates when Vietnam became part of the nation’s consciousness), or even any particular individual—it’s the entire military industrial complex. Indeed, the target of the song is capitalism as much as it is war itself: “Is your money that good? Will it buy you forgiveness? Do you think that it could? / I think you will find, when your death takes its toll / All that money you made will never buy back your soul.”

Despite aiming at such an amorphous and complex enemy, the song contains almost no abstractions. Dylan puts a face on an inherently faceless concept: “I just want you to know I can see through your masks.” This of course leaves the song open to criticisms of naïveté. Tim Riley called the song “acerbic to the point of absurdity,” and he’s right that the song is reductive, but that’s the point.

Even Dylan admits as much in the sixth stanza: “You might say that I’m young, you might say I’m unlearned / But there’s one thing I know, though I’m younger than you / Even Jesus would never forgive what you do.” The simplicity of the song, both in its lyrics and its melody, is its strength. Dylan is not concerned with winning the argument. In the singer’s mind, there is no argument left to be had, so there is no sense wasting time with the nuances of the debate. This song is about the visceral hatred the Good has for Evil.

And the fact that the song doesn’t shy away from that hatred is what makes it so effective. Like Henry David Thoreau writing about John Brown, Dylan is so convinced of his own righteousness that he relishes the death of his enemy: “I hope that you die, and your death’ll come soon / I will follow your casket, in the pale afternoon / And I’ll watch while you’re lowered, down to your deathbed / And I’ll stand over your grave, til I’m sure that you’re dead.” This final stanza is one of the most haunting Dylan would write. Though it stops short of explicitly advocating murder, the song has become dark and macabre in a way that suggests nobody remains unsullied by the masters of war—even the good are driven standing over headstones.

“Masters of War,” then, symbolizes a lot of what Dylan would come to reject in his own songwriting, namely oversimplification and accusatory self-righteousness. And yet it retains its forcefulness—and continues to get covered every time the American war machine revs up again—largely because of this childlike emotion, the basic sense of right and wrong that it appeals to. For someone as esoteric as Dylan, it’s important for morality to maintain its absolutes.

About these ads

7 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by soulmerchant on August 21, 2010 at 5:02 PM

    I dunno, don’t you think Dylan was rejecting moral absolutes along with self-righteousness and protest songwriting?

    Reply

    • Posted by John S on August 21, 2010 at 6:25 PM

      Maybe eventually, but not here. I suppose the song could be taken as a parody of moral absolutism, but I think that’s probably unjustifiably cynical. Given the point of Dylan’s career when this was written, it seems more likely that the song is meant earnestly, and I think the song is has more impact if you sympathize with the singer’s vindictive self-righteousness than if you dismiss it.

      Reply

      • Posted by soulmerchant on August 21, 2010 at 6:34 PM

        Oh, yes, I agree with that. I quibble only with the last sentence–i.e., it seems to me that it would be more accurate to say that for Dylan, it *was* important for morality to maintain its absolutes.

        Reply

  2. [...] Aught Lang Syne « Ranking Bob Dylan Songs, #54: Masters Of War [...]

    Reply

  3. Posted by Jackie Hayden on August 23, 2010 at 11:54 AM

    It’s not true that “there are only two people mentioned in the song”, I and you. There’s also a reference to Judas as in “Like Judas of old you lie and deceive” as well as Jesus, in, as the writer himself quotes “Even Jesus would never forgive what you do”.
    Judas also features in two other Dylan songs ‘With God On Our Side’ and ‘‘The Ballad Of Frankie Lee And Judas Priest’.
    But Jesus may be the most often referenced person in all of Dylan’s canon, showing up in ‘Property Of Jesus’, ‘It’s Alright Ma (I’m Only Bleeding)’, ‘With God On Our Side’, ‘What Will You Do When Jesus Comes?’ ‘Bob Dylan’s 115th Dream’, ‘Visions Of Johanna’, ‘Caribbean Wind’, ‘Masters of War’, ‘Foot Of Pride’, ‘Precious Angel’, ‘In The Garden’, ‘Ain’t No Man Righteous, No Not One’, ‘Coverdown Breakthrough’,‘Gonna Change My Way of Thinking’ and ‘I’m Not There’ (and maybe more?)

    Reply

  4. Posted by ohmercy on August 23, 2010 at 1:16 PM

    Very nice analysis/explication-
    Dylan has said explicitly that the song was about the Military Industrial Complex that President Eisenhower spoke so eloquently about in his farewell address when he left office. (Back when Republicans were sane and certainly more left than what we have been seeing now- of course many Dems seem to the right of what Repups were back then. After all Nixon himself enacted the clean water and clean air bill- errr- I digress. Sorry- didn’t mean to go off on a political tangent-)

    One of the things I love about Bob and his music is that we all seem to project onto him (the person) what we believe him to be- what we want him to be -idealized in ways. (for instance the “right wing bob” website- another site about his Jewishness and the articles and talks that are written and given about his work. Recently I heard a talk by a Buddhist teacher explicating “Visions of Johanna” as being a sitting in Sesshin. (sp) The Jungians have many who give papers and write articles- And the books- oi, the books. Sean Wilentz has a new book coming out- that I cannot wait for- and he calls Bob an historian-
    And we interpret lyrics depending on our own life situations- where we are at the time- we hear new things in songs that we have listened to hundreds of times- we’ve changed, what we hear has changed and maybe we have an AHA moment about some aspect of the world or ourselves. This is what happens with very good poetry and with Scripture- It is alive. There are layers of meanings- and it matters not what the author meant or felt when he wrote it. Because it is continually being born (as is Bob Dylan) the layers change, reform, surface when they will. Perhaps for the writer as well?

    but this song, as you point out so well endures as an unambiguous commentary.

    Wow- I didn’t mean to go on and on so much.
    One thing I like about reading about Bob is it pushes me to clarify and articulate what I have been thinking about him. I’ve been in the process of starting a blog with Bob as the theme but have not actually posted anything yet- I’m trying to figure out where I am going with it, what the purpose is for me.
    Hope you don’t mind but I think my response to your thoughtful article will be my first post. (I’ll link back to you of course- not that it will matter as I don’t/won’t have any readers. LOL)
    Scary- that means I have to DO it.
    and NAME it.

    anyway, thanks for the interesting and thought provoking post.

    Reply

  5. [...] our memories and perceptions of that era. And some of it certainly was great (especially if it was written by this guy). But a lot of it was pretty terrible: “Imagine” and “Give Peace a Chance” [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 109 other followers

%d bloggers like this: